Tall Rubber vs Low Profile

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by ramirezbrandonc, Apr 9, 2018.

  1. ramirezbrandonc

    ramirezbrandonc Bobtail Member

    26
    25
    Feb 1, 2018
    Santa Fe, NM
    0
    I was wondering if any of you had any experience or knowledge that you could pass on to me regarding the pros and cons of having more or less sidewall.

    I have several older trucks that are running on older steel rims that I would like to change over to aluminum or another alloy type of rim to save on overall weight and fuel mileage. I have been wondering if I would be better off running low pro tires or tall rubber for several applications ranging from a dump truck to highway trucks running flatbeds and drop decks.

    I have always preferred a tall rim and a tall sidewall for the off-road benefits that I perceive them to have despite the fact that the majority of my work is highway. My dad has always preferred a low profile tire.

    Has anyone switched from one to the other and noticed any difference on fuel mileage, tire life, brake life, turning radius or limitations, or performance on and off road? Any other changes you can think of that I have not addressed please feel free to address.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. I glide 47

    I glide 47 Road Train Member

    1,426
    1,523
    Jun 3, 2017
    0
    Low profile offers less rolling resistance less weight better pulling power easier to find tires on the road because everyone uses them it's a win win. But for off road work you may need to stay with the tall rubber. Low profile also gives better fuel economy
     
  4. Brettj3876

    Brettj3876 Road Train Member

    11,257
    54,056
    Nov 18, 2014
    Land of local
    0
    Going to small rubber you'll gain pulling power but run at a higher rpm thus lose some mpg.
     
    ramirezbrandonc and Heavyd Thank this.
  5. I glide 47

    I glide 47 Road Train Member

    1,426
    1,523
    Jun 3, 2017
    0
    Lower rolling resistance will over come the higher rpm and thus better fuel economy. I know I gust opened the can of worms but that' my two cents
     
    ramirezbrandonc Thanks this.
  6. QuietStorm

    QuietStorm Heavy Load Member

    899
    1,416
    Dec 11, 2016
    0
    24.5 low pro and 11r22.5 have the same diameter therefore same rpms
     
    ramirezbrandonc Thanks this.
  7. I glide 47

    I glide 47 Road Train Member

    1,426
    1,523
    Jun 3, 2017
    0
    You win the cigar. Correct but I was referrng to 22.5 low pro
     
    ramirezbrandonc Thanks this.
  8. ramirezbrandonc

    ramirezbrandonc Bobtail Member

    26
    25
    Feb 1, 2018
    Santa Fe, NM
    0
    My biggest question was if the higher RPM caused by a change in diameter would be offset by a change in rolling resistance. I think the answer is to keep 24.5s with high rubber on my off road trucks and to go up from 22.5 to 24.5 and use low profile tires for my highway trucks in the future. Thank you for the help.
     
    QuietStorm Thanks this.
  9. DL550CAT

    DL550CAT Road Train Member

    1,427
    1,482
    Oct 18, 2009
    Waynesburg, Pa
    0
    Ya can argue fuel mileage all you want but..... 24.5 look better.
     
    Cat sdp and ramirezbrandonc Thank this.
  10. I glide 47

    I glide 47 Road Train Member

    1,426
    1,523
    Jun 3, 2017
    0
     
    ramirezbrandonc Thanks this.
  11. I glide 47

    I glide 47 Road Train Member

    1,426
    1,523
    Jun 3, 2017
    0
    They do look better I agree with you ps. That don't happen very often
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.