You can't fight a warning since you don't have to appear in court for a warning. You'd have to file a lawsuit against the state of Kentucky. Good luck.
Level II, driver issued warning for ELD/AOBRD "not registered with FMCSA"
Discussion in 'ELD Forum | Questions, Answers and Reviews' started by CousinVinny, Jan 5, 2018.
Page 3 of 4
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-
I thought we are required to carry an instruction card from the device manufacturer and present it to the inspector upon request? Like the one I carry.
Attached Files:
Oxbow Thanks this. -
-
-
What device is that? Has the OP ever listed it yet?
-
-
I see. Well, I hate to be a doubter, but something doesn't seem right about the way this is being presented. The required instruction cab card should of been enough to satisfy the inspector. I suspect it wasn't on the truck.
-
Here is from the FAQ.:
What electronic logging device (ELD) user documentation must be onboard a driver’s commercial motor vehicle?
Beginning on December 18, 2017, a driver using an ELD must have an ELD information packet onboard the commercial motor vehicle (CMV) containing the following items:
- A user’s manual for the driver describing how to operate the ELD;
- An instruction sheet describing the data transfer mechanisms supported by the ELD and step-by-step instructions to produce and transfer the driver’s hours-of-service records to an authorized safety official;
- An instruction sheet for the driver describing ELD malfunction reporting requirements and recordkeeping procedures during ELD malfunctions; and
- A supply of blank driver’s records of duty status (RODS) graph-grids sufficient to record the driver’s duty status and other related information for a minimum of 8 days.
Yes. The user's manual, instruction sheet, and malfunction instruction sheet can be in electronic form. This is in accordance with the federal register titled "Regulatory Guidance Concerning Electronic Signatures and Documents" (76 FR 411). -
Okay, either way, I suspect the driver wasn't trained properly then on how to provide the information on the device itself IF he was using an ELD.
The other key wording I read in the OP quote from the inspection report was "Inoperative." In other words, I don't think the inspector was acting willy nilly in this situation.
Just my own personal take and that's itOxbow Thanks this. -
Whatcha expect from a state who's abbreviation is a world known sex lube ??
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 3 of 4