FYI
Proper Use of Tiedowns
The new regulations require each tiedown to be attached and secured in a manner that prevents it from becoming loose, unfastening, opening or releasing while the vehicle is in transit. All tiedowns and other components of a cargo securement system used to secure loads on a trailer equipped with rub rails must be located inboard of the rub rails whenever practicable. Also, edge protection must be used whenever a tiedown would be subject to abrasion or cutting at the point where it touches an article of cargo. The edge protection must resist abrasion, cutting and crushing.
http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/truck/vehicle/cs-policy.htm
Law that straps are to be inside the rub rail
Discussion in 'Flatbed Trucking Forum' started by Billerd, Jun 6, 2013.
Page 1 of 6
-
texasmorrell, MackDaddyMark, dogcatcher and 5 others Thank this.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Good post. Straight facts. Somebody will come along in a minute and tell you that you are wrong because they heard differently.
123456, dogcatcher, Marlin46 and 1 other person Thank this. -
123456 Thanks this.
-
I'm your Huckleberry.....
http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regu...le_making_details.aspx?ruleid=5&year=2013&cat=
Page 8 of the PDF file shows where in 2006, the FMCSA rescended this ruling.
"The Agency believes that inmany instances, the nature of the cargodictates the ability of the cargosecurement devices to meet the existingrequirements of§ 393.104(f)(4). Asdiscussed in the NPRM, however, Stateenforcement personnel and motorcarriers expressed difficulties inachieving uniform and consistentenforcement of the regulation.Therefore, the Agency rescinds§ 393.104(f)(4) as proposed."
dogcatcher, Billerd, leadfoot80 and 7 others Thank this. -
It looks tidier that way anyways. I like tidy and keep the bungies inside the rail whenever possible as well.
Don't go to BC with the belt wrapped around the rub rail even if its designed for that by the manufacturer, that's just begging for trouble.Billerd Thanks this. -
393.104(f)(3) referencing 393.104(f)(4) says because of different interpretations and inequality of enforcement there is no inherent risk in having securement outside the rubrail. Glad I can read. I know the safety lady where I lease goes to court n makes cops look cheap when they write tickets for it: now I know right where to point it out.
stwik, Billerd, bullhaulerswife and 2 others Thank this. -
-
Thanks again!MJ1657, Sublime, Ruthless and 1 other person Thank this. -
Great thread! We have a few flatbeds and nobody had noticed the rule was changed. Now we know.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 6