Hazmat, and hauling diesel fuel?

Discussion in 'Hazmat Trucking Forum' started by Scout76, Dec 22, 2018.

  1. wis bang

    wis bang Road Train Member

    3,348
    3,917
    Jan 12, 2011
    Levittown, PA
    0
    over 119 gallons makes it bulk package [tank]
     
    Makeajump Thanks this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Gumper

    Gumper Road Train Member

    1,536
    3,389
    Jan 7, 2018
    Butte, MT
    0
    Yeah the 1,001 is for other types of hazardous material
     
    snowwy Thanks this.
  4. King Michael

    King Michael Light Load Member

    89
    72
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
     
  5. King Michael

    King Michael Light Load Member

    89
    72
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    The law states that any fuel amounts exceeding or equal to 119 gallons are subject to the Hazardous Materials Regulations. This means that anyone who transports liquids (as listed in the hazardous materials table) in bulk containers with the capacity of 119 gallons or more must have a CDL with a hazmat endorsement, and if it's in a tanker, you must have a tanker endorsement, which combined gives you an "X" endorsement on your CDL Diesel fuels, either off road or on highway are a Class III combustible hazardous material which DO require placards.
    There are exceptions, (the fuel tanks on your truck etc.).
     
  6. King Michael

    King Michael Light Load Member

    89
    72
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    Also, if you do not know the answer to your question, go back and read the book.
    The answer, as I posted above, is very clear. All information re: that very clear answer is in the book.
     
  7. snowwy

    snowwy Road Train Member

    20,527
    13,262
    Jul 6, 2009
    0
    Apparently there's some tanker endorsement required also for not just tanks.

    Even totes requires it. I don't know remember the rules on that one. There was a discussion on here awhile back. I know I had some loads only assigned to me because I was the only driver in the company that had the endorsement.
     
  8. kemosabi49

    kemosabi49 Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    10,435
    44,384
    Jan 13, 2013
    SW Arkansas
    0
    Totes that are loaded with at least 119 gallons require the tanker endorsement.
     
    snowwy Thanks this.
  9. Makeajump

    Makeajump Medium Load Member

    443
    363
    Apr 19, 2014
    Texas
    0
    A container that has a capacity of 119 gallons or more is a bulk container (as in tote) if used to haul hazmat and requires the X endorsement whether loaded or empty. You must have the X endorsement......and run the proper placards even if they are empty, (residue, vapors, etc,)
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2019
  10. kemosabi49

    kemosabi49 Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    10,435
    44,384
    Jan 13, 2013
    SW Arkansas
    0
    Wrong. You don't need the tank endorsement for empty totes. Per FMCSA:

    Question 13: On May 9, 2011, FMCSA revised the definition of "tank vehicle" to include any commercial motor vehicle that is designed to transport any liquid or gaseous materials within a tank or tanks having an individual rated capacity of more than 119 gallons and an aggregate rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more that is either permanently or temporarily attached to the vehicle or the chassis. Does the new definition include loaded intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) or other tanks temporarily attached to a CMV?

    Guidance:

    Yes. The new definition is intended to cover (1) a vehicle transporting an IBC or other tank used for any liquid or gaseous materials, with an individual rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more that is either permanently or temporarily attached to the vehicle or chassis; or (2) a vehicle used to transport multiple IBCs or other tanks having an individual rated capacity of more than 119 gallons and an aggregate rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more that are permanently or temporarily attached to the vehicle or the chassis.



    Question 14: On May 9, 2011, FMCSA revised the definition of "tank vehicle." Does the new definition cover the transportation of empty intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) or other tanks, or empty storage tanks?

    Guidance:

    No. The definition of "tank vehicle" does not cover the transportation of empty IBCs or other tanks when these containers are manifested as either empty or as residue on a bill of lading. Furthermore, the definition of tank vehicle does not cover the transportation of empty storage tanks that are not designed for transportation and have a rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more, that are temporarily attached to a flatbed vehicle.
     
    Makeajump Thanks this.
  11. Makeajump

    Makeajump Medium Load Member

    443
    363
    Apr 19, 2014
    Texas
    0
    I was editing my post while you were posting the guidance. My brain is calibrated to think in terms of labels and placards still on the tote, and it being called "empty", while it still displays the hazmat label and placards. This being because we return the "empties" to be refilled and shipped out again and they do contain small amounts of hazardous materials, vapors, etc.(the vapors are extremely explosive, even more so than the liquid material). The guidance seems to be in conflict between the question 13 and question 14. It doesn't mention hazardous materials specifically as it does mention "any liquid or gaseous materials".
     
    King Michael Thanks this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.