265 vs 234 wheel base

Discussion in 'Experienced Truckers' Advice' started by freightlinerman, Jun 27, 2014.

  1. freightlinerman

    freightlinerman Road Train Member

    1,287
    536
    Mar 4, 2011
    Florida
    0
    How do these differences in wheel base stack up? Sure, the longer wheel base has a better ride, it turns worse. But, in the real world how does it compare to making a right hand turn, or backing in at a tiny Pilot?

    My concern is not being able to back into certain parking spots because of the added wheel base. With a 234 inch, at some of these truck stops, specifically Pilots for example, it looks like they were made for a 48' trailer. Even with a shorter wheel base in a Columbia style condo sleeper, you have to be a magician to get it in there.

    I'm not sure what the weight difference is either, that extra three feet of frame rails doesn't help. Just curious what your thoughts and opinions are. Thank you.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. kw550cat

    kw550cat Medium Load Member

    663
    596
    May 22, 2012
    brooklyn, new york
    0
    If you can drive you will have no issues. Just look at the guys project 350.and 351. Those were northeast trucks used everyday. Now , it's 331 instead of 51. The more you practice the easier it will be especially if you practice on trucks with longer wheelbases. The longer frame helps make the truck look cooler.
     
  4. STexan

    STexan Road Train Member

    14,963
    29,153
    Oct 3, 2011
    Longview, TX
    0
    Significant difference will be noticed and the tighter the area, the more you'll notice how much that 30 inches makes a HUGE difference. The ride difference will be negligible compared to the difficulty in maneuvering tight spaces and turns that will certainly be there. Plus the longer wheel base may hurt trade in value.
     
  5. d281833

    d281833 Heavy Load Member

    881
    919
    May 15, 2012
    0
    Not to mention the amount of air drag with greater distance between cab and trailer, and yes the maneuvering would be a huge pita.
     
  6. Richter

    Richter Road Train Member

    4,090
    1,700
    Feb 13, 2012
    Philadelphia Pa
    0
    First off, what are you pulling? Why do you want the longer. Longer just for looks is pretty stupid if you care about performance. 30 inch isn't gonna change rid performance much. Now if you want longer so you have more room for a headache rack in flatbed, or something like that, then go with the longer. You can always make it fit....but why add the hassle if you dont need the longer.
     
    alds Thanks this.
  7. Derailed

    Derailed Road Train Member

    2,383
    2,657
    Dec 10, 2008
    Upstate NY
    0
    Yes there will be a noticeable difference in tighter spots. This is why you don't see many gas haulers running longer wheelbase trucks. With that being said, 265" would not be considered excessive for most general freight IMO. Wouldn't want to go much longer though.
     
  8. Passin Thru

    Passin Thru Road Train Member

    1,918
    565
    Mar 8, 2007
    VA
    0
    Drove 300 in WB and my last was a 379 w/ 265. Makes a a big difference in ride. Joints on any Eisenhour contrete highway are 240 inches and 239 fits between the concrete joints giving a jerk every time. 265 has time to get on the next slab and it won't make any difference backing in or gettin in a truck stop. Make sure you're under 65 ft 1".
     
  9. Ezrider_48501

    Ezrider_48501 Road Train Member

    3,845
    5,130
    Apr 2, 2011
    bismarck, nd
    0
    265 wheel base wouldn't be a problem iv drove 300 in wheel base trucks and that long can be a bit of a pain but always managed to get the truck in anywhere i needed to. 265 isn't too long in my opinion 280+ is where it can start being a issue in tight spaces. and really 280 is plenty manageable.
     
    TripleSix Thanks this.
  10. freightlinerman

    freightlinerman Road Train Member

    1,287
    536
    Mar 4, 2011
    Florida
    0
    265 is standard for a W900, a Classic, or Coronado. I'm looking at trucks and see a few in a good price range, but I've never driven something like that so it makes me ask. AS far as the gap, there is no bigger gap from what I can tell. Application is hauling 53' van trailers OTR.
     
  11. x#1

    x#1 Road Train Member

    1,773
    1,104
    Dec 24, 2009
    Cherokee County, Alabama
    0
    for starters,the 234" wb will most likely be a set back front axle and the 265" wb will be a set forward front axle. set forward equates a better ride automatically and without fail.to me,the only nice looking sba is a T800 KW.

    you can get longer wheel based sba but why?
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.