Super load in TX accident kills three

Discussion in 'Heavy Haul Trucking Forum' started by roundhouse, Apr 28, 2024.

  1. kylefitzy

    kylefitzy Road Train Member

    4,033
    16,554
    Aug 12, 2007
    Kansas city,Mo
    0
    I was looking at the pictures more with what you said in mind. It looks like the yellow highlighted chains went to the big lugs, one on each side. Also the skid poles are still on the top of the load, that leads me to believe the load didn’t roll to the side, maybe I’m missing something. IMG_6857.jpeg
    Just trying to learn, I would love to do some bunk and dolly loads someday.
     
    cke Thanks this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. roundhouse

    roundhouse Road Train Member

    2,918
    6,464
    Jul 11, 2018
    0
    Then there is no way a f-150 slamming into it caused it to fall off the trailer .
     
  4. Landincoldfire

    Landincoldfire Heavy Load Member

    849
    4,439
    Sep 27, 2015
    New Holland, Pa
    0
    The two that were killed were pretty young (22 and 17). Stuff happens, we all know it does. Without the proper information it’s hard to point fingers at what happened.
     
  5. idriveaholden

    idriveaholden Super Heavy Hauler

    583
    1,825
    Mar 14, 2018
    0
    I didn’t mean like actually rolling out of the saddle, just the force of the load wanting to roll/ torque.There’s probably a better term but idk

    you can see under the saddle the turntable leans, It’s that side to side force, it’s a cylinder it wants to roll
    Basically they had nothing for the side to side motion. The ones you highlighted and the chains over the top should have just been their extras.
    Most of the chains should have been concentrated on going under, around, and back.

    Also they were depending on the welds way more than they should have. There should be a bunch of chains straight from the saddle to the turntable. I don’t see any.

    at those weights we always said the chains are just for show. If you do anything dramatic theres no reasonable amount of securement that’s gonna stop it.
    Theres way more brakes than you could ever need on the trailers like I said before. I think that’s the biggest part of this. He used too much brake
     
    cke, kylefitzy and Feedman Thank this.
  6. kylefitzy

    kylefitzy Road Train Member

    4,033
    16,554
    Aug 12, 2007
    Kansas city,Mo
    0
    Just for everyone’s benefit, here are two clear pictures of the accident.
    IMG_6860.jpeg IMG_6859.jpeg It’s clear the back turntable did not fail, at least completely. It looks like the back of the load/saddle just fell off due to the securement. There are quite a few holes where I assume lashing rings used to be.

    Here is a similar load that I took a picture of last year, I had to screenshot a portion of a larger panoramic. IMG_6861.png
    The load is secured in a similar fashion. with quite a few more chains, but everything is indirect, straight over the top.

    When you say “under, around, and back” do you mean hooking both ends of the chain to the same side of the turntable? I could see how that would provide more side to side securement.

    edit to add: sure looks like there should be more securement points in the famonville turn table for a dual lane trailer. The picture I took was on a 8 axle dolly and there are significantly more d rings.
     
    TripleSix, Feedman, cke and 1 other person Thank this.
  7. idriveaholden

    idriveaholden Super Heavy Hauler

    583
    1,825
    Mar 14, 2018
    0
    IMG_0588.jpeg

    Yeah, that load has the same risk .
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.